[1. Roll Call]
[00:00:10]
WELCOME TO THE OCTOBER 1ST CORRIDOR REVIEW COMMITTEE. IF YOU WOULD PLEASE MUTE YOUR PHONES AND ANY OTHER DEVICES THAT YOU MAY HAVE. MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE? VAUGHN COCHRAN HERE. LAUREN MCDONALD HERE. ELIJAH. GEORGE. THIS IS THE TIME FOR PUBLIC COMMENT THAT'S NOT RELATED TO THE AGENDA. AND I DON'T SEE THAT ANYBODY'S HERE, SO WE'LL SKIP THAT. THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ABOUT THE
[3. Approval of Minutes]
MINUTES FROM LAST TIME? NO. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM OUR LAST MEETING. I SECOND THE MOTION. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE, AYE. OKAY, GREAT. THE NEXT MEETING, I[7. Next Scheduled Meeting Date(s):]
THINK, IS NOVEMBER THE 5TH. UNLESS WE DO NOT HAVE ANY APPLICATIONS. OKAY. ARE THERE[4. Modification and approval of Agenda]
ANY CHANGES TO THE CURRENT AGENDA? NO. MR. NO. OKAY, GREAT. ALL RIGHT. SO THE WE'LL MOVE ON[5. Continued Items from the previous meeting]
TO THE REGULAR AGENDA. AND I SHOW THAT THERE ARE THREE THINGS. IF YOU WOULD PLEASE GIVE THE STAFF REPORT. THANK YOU. THIS IS FOR FOR APPLICATIONS HP2026-005500560057 AND 0058. OH. OKAY. WE JUST NEED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. TODAY'S AGENDA, IF YOU WOULD PLEASE JUST. WELL, THE FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA. WELL, WE KIND OF JUST DO AN OVERALL APPROVAL OF THE ACTUAL AGENDA. THE THE CRC NEEDS TO DO THAT. SO CLOSE EMOTION, YOU'LL JUST DO A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. AND A SECOND AND A QUICK VOTE.OKAY. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE TODAY'S AGENDA. I'LL SECOND THAT. OKAY. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE, AYE. OKAY. THANK YOU. NOW WE CAN START WITH THE APPLICATIONS AND THE STAFF REPORT. THANK YOU. SO WELL, COULD THE APPLICANTS PLEASE COME FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AND BE SWORN IN. FREMONT LATIMER, 34 CORDOVA STREET.
CONNOR DOWLING, SIX NINE, FIVE 16TH STREET. RYAN WINDLER, 133 OVIEDO STREET. DONNA WENDLER, 134 KING STREET. THANK YOU. DO YOU SOLEMNLY SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU'RE ABOUT TO GIVE IS THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? MAY WE HAVE THE STAFF REPORT, PLEASE? YES. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. SO AGAIN, THESE APPLICATIONS WERE CONTINUED AT THE AUGUST 6TH, 2026 MEETING TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TIME TO CLARIFY PLANS, PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS, RESPOND TO SOME OF THE COMMITTEE COMMENTS, AND ATTEND THE SEPTEMBER 3RD PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING, WHICH HAS RELATED VARIANCES THAT, BASED UPON APPROVAL OR DENIAL, COULD ALTER THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLANS THAT ARE PRESENTED TO THE CRC TODAY. THE PCB APPLICATIONS RELATED TO THIS PROJECT WERE CONTINUED TO THE OCTOBER 6TH PCB MEETING, SO THAT WILL BE NEXT WEEK. AS FAR AS ITEMS THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE DESIGN STANDARDS OR HAVE BEEN IN RESPONSE TO LAST MONTH'S COMMENTS FROM STAFF AND THE CORRIDOR REVIEW COMMITTEE, THE TEAM DID ADD ADDITIONAL SHADE TREES MANZANILLO OLIVES SPECIFICALLY TO THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE. MATERIALS IN THE FRONT COURTYARD SPACE ALONG KING STREET AND THE SPINELESS YUCCA PLANTS PROPOSED ALONG THE SITE HAVE BEEN RELOCATED AND REPLACED WITH LADY PALMS. BOTH CHANGES ARE IN RESPONSE TO CRC RECOMMENDATIONS AND THE ONGOING PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD. APPLICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT STILL INCLUDE VARIANCES TO CERTAIN LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING THE SIDE YARD BUFFERS. IF THE PCB APPLICATIONS ARE APPROVED WITH THE REQUESTED VARIANCES, THE LANDSCAPING AS PROPOSED WOULD BE CONSIDERED COMPLIANT. HOWEVER, IF DENIED, MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN WILL BE REQUIRED TO MEET BOTH THE CITY CODE AND THE DESIGN STANDARDS LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. IN RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS, APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, PRIMARILY HVAC UNITS, ARE PROVIDED IN THE UPDATED SITE PLAN. THE DESIGN STANDARDS REQUIRE THAT MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT BE LOCATED OR SCREENED IN SUCH A WAY THAT IT IS NOT VISIBLE FROM ANY PUBLIC
[00:05:05]
RIGHTS OF WAY, SO CHANGES TO THESE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT, LOCATIONS OR THE ADDITION OF MORE EQUIPMENT WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL STAFF REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS AND MAY REQUIRE CRC APPROVAL IF THEY ARE VISIBLE FROM THE STREET OR REQUIRE EXTENSIVE ADDITIONAL SCREENING. AND PROPOSED BUILDING COLORS HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE LATEST SUBMITTAL AND REFLECT A DESIRE TO KEEP THE EXISTING WHITE BODY COLOR, BUT ADD TRIM AND ACCENT COLORS CHOSEN FROM THE PRE-APPROVED COLOR PALETTE. THIS PROPOSED COLOR PLAN MEETS THE MINIMUM OF TWO AND MAXIMUM OF FOUR COLORS REQUIRED PER THE CORRIDOR. ALL RIGHT, SO STAFF HAD NOTED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS THAT THE PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL STYLE FOR THE NEW CONSTRUCTION AT THE REAR OF 130 AND 132 KING STREET IS CONSISTENT WITH THE FRAME VERNACULAR STYLE WHICH DOMINATES THE PROPERTIES AND. ACCORDING TO THE DESIGN STANDARDS, ALL STRUCTURES ON A ON A SITE SHALL BE OF THE SAME ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER. THE CRC SHOULD DETERMINE WHETHER THE DIFFERENT ARCHITECTURAL STYLE, MASS AND SCALE OF THE NEW HOTEL STRUCTURE ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE OVERALL PROJECT SITE AND THE SURROUNDING CORRIDOR.STREETSCAPE, WHICH FEATURES PRIMARILY ONE AND TWO STORY RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES. ADDITIONALLY, AS WAS MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY, THE MASONRY STOREFRONT ADDITION TO THE FRAME VERNACULAR STRUCTURE AT 130 KING STREET IS PROPOSED TO BE A STUCCO FINISH TO MATCH THE NEW CONSTRUCTION AT THE REAR, RATHER THAN THE REMAINDER OF THE FRAME VERNACULAR STRUCTURES TO WHICH IT IS ATTACHED, AND ALTERING THE EXISTING ARCHITECTURAL STYLE OF THIS PORTION OF THE BUILDING WOULD CHANGE THE HISTORIC LOOK OF IT AS WELL. IT ALSO APPEARS THAT THE PARAPET WALL HAS BEEN MODIFIED TO INCLUDE SOME BRICK DETAILING TO BE MORE CONSISTENT WITH THE MASONRY ELEMENTS AT 134 KING STREET, SO THAT IS A CHANGE IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.
IN RESPONSE TO CRC COMMENTS, THE FLOOR PLAN FOR THE ROOFTOP ROOFTOP DECK HAS BEEN MODIFIED TO INCLUDE AN AREA AT THE RAILING ALONG KING STREET, WHERE GUESTS ACCESS IS NOT BLOCKED BY THE PROPOSED PLANTERS. PROPOSED LIGHTING FEATURES WERE ADDED FOR THE ROOFTOP DECK, WHICH INCLUDES STRING LIGHTS. THESE ARE NOT GENERALLY CONSIDERED CONSISTENT WITH THE DESIGN STANDARDS, WHICH REQUIRE THAT SOURCES OF LIGHT BE SCREENED WITHIN A FIXTURE OR OPAQUE GLASS, SO THE CRC SHOULD DETERMINE WHETHER A MODIFICATION TO THE STANDARDS FOR THE STRING LIGHTS IS APPROPRIATE, OR SUGGEST ALTERNATIVE LIGHTING OPTIONS.
THE AUGUST STAFF REPORT NOTED THAT THE PROPOSED MAIN PEDESTRIAN GATE POSTS, WHICH STRADDLE 132 AND 134 KING STREET, EXCEED THE RECOMMENDED FIVE FOOT WALL HEIGHT SET BY THE DESIGN STANDARDS, AND THE CRC ALSO NOTED THAT THE PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN ENTRY GATE MIGHT BE A LITTLE TOO GRAND IN DESIGN FOR THE VERNACULAR RESIDENTIAL SCALE OF THE HISTORIC STRUCTURES ALONG KING STREET. NO ADDITIONAL PLANS WERE PROVIDED TO CONSIDER A SCALED DOWN VERSION OF THE GATE THAT WOULD STILL CLEARLY DELINEATE THE ENTRANCE, SO THE CRC SHOULD DETERMINE WHETHER THE GATE AT THE PROPOSED SCALE IS APPROPRIATE. AND NO DETAILS RELATED TO THE DECK STRUCTURES NOTED IN THE PREVIOUS STAFF REPORT, WHICH ARE STILL VISIBLE IN THE ELEVATION AND UPDATED ELEVATION DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. I DID DISCUSS THAT RAILING DETAIL WITH MR. LATIMER, AND HE EXPLAINED THAT THAT IS ACTUALLY A PORTION OF THE POOL DECK THAT SORT OF SET FURTHER BACK AND SHOULDN'T BE QUITE AS PROMINENTLY VISIBLE IN THIS PARTICULAR DRAWING. ADDITIONALLY, WE HAVE ASKED FOR SOME DETAILS RELATED TO THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE OF THE BUILDING. AT TWO 36.5 KING STREET, WHICH IS SET BACK BEHIND 236 KING STREET AND WILL BE BASICALLY A NEW CONSTRUCTION. IT IS CURRENTLY SORT OF A RUIN WITH JUST FOUR WALLS, AND IT APPEARS THAT THAT CONSTRUCTION IS MOSTLY FRAMED VERNACULAR, BUT THERE ARE SOME DESIGN ELEMENTS, SUCH AS THE HORIZONTAL METAL RAILING, THAT WOULDN'T BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FRAME VERNACULAR STYLE, AND THE APPLICANT MAY CONSIDER MODIFYING THAT TO BE MORE CONSISTENT WITH THE HISTORIC STRUCTURES SURROUNDING THAT BUILDING. AND BASED ON A REVIEW OF THE KING STREET DESIGN STANDARDS FOR ENTRY CORRIDORS, AND WITHOUT EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY, THE CRC MAY CONTINUE THE PROPOSED DESIGN TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TIME TO RESPOND TO ANY CRC OR STAFF COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. FINALIZE DETAILS OF THE FORTHCOMING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT COULD MODIFY DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS WHICH FALL UNDER CRC PURVIEW, AND PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAILS FOR THE DESIGN OF THE ONE 36.5 KING STREET CONSTRUCTION, AS WELL AS OTHER DESIGN DETAILS AS IDENTIFIED BY THE CRC. AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. WE'RE AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DOES THE APPLICANT HAVE ANY THING TO ADD TO THIS PRESENTATION? THANK YOU, BOARD MEMBERS. YES WE HAVE. WE'VE GOT A BRIEF PRESENTATION. WE WANT
[00:10:03]
TO ADDRESS ALL THE THE ITEMS MISS SEYMOUR DISCUSSED, AS WELL AS THE ITEMS WE WENT THROUGH AT THE LAST MEETING, IS, OH, YOU GUYS CAN SEE IT. IT'S NOT UP ON THE SCREEN. OKAY, SO THE ITEMS FIRST PAINT COLORS AND ELEVATIONS. I THINK PAINT COLORS ARE PROBABLY THE LARGEST TOPIC OF DISCUSSION LAST TIME. SO WE'VE GOT QUITE A BIT TO GO OVER THERE. THEN I WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE AND MATERIALS FOR 130 KING. ONE 36.5 KING, WHICH IS THE POOL BUILDING, WHICH IS SET BEHIND THE NEW HOTEL AND BANQUET BUILDING, AND THEN ON LANDSCAPE AND SITE. I WANT TO GO OVER THE ADDITIONAL SHADE, TREES AND LANDSCAPE CHANGES, THE PEDESTRIAN GATE AND THEN UTILITY LOCATIONS. SO WE'LL START WITH THE ARCHITECTURE, WHICH CONNOR CAN RUN THROUGH. THANK YOU, BOARD MEMBERS. SO FIRSTLY, WE ADDRESSED WITH OUR CLIENTS THE COLOR PALETTE OF THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS AS WE DISCUSSED FOR OUR LAST MEETING.SO RIGHT NOW OUR CURRENT PROPOSAL IS TO SORT OF HAVE A HAVE A NICE CLEAN PALETTE THAT REPRESENTS ACTUALLY WHAT THE, THE CURRENT BUILDINGS ARE PAINTED TODAY IN A, IN A SAINT AUGUSTINE WHITE. AND THEN WITH A TRIM, WHICH WOULD BE THE, THE SECOND COLOR FROM THE TOP RIGHT, WHICH WOULD BE SORT OF A LIGHT GREENISH BLUE. WE TOOK THE THE COMMITTEE'S ADVICE FROM LAST TIME AND STUDIED A GREEN COLOR FOR THE NEW MASONRY STRUCTURE SET BACK. AND YOU CAN KIND OF IMAGINE BOTH OF THESE DRAWINGS ON THE SCREEN, YOU KNOW, ONE SHOWING THE LANDSCAPE AND ONE SHOWING JUST THE BUILDINGS INTENTIONALLY TO SO YOU CAN SEE THE COLOR, BUT BOTH OF THEM OVERLAID TOGETHER, YOU KNOW, THE CONCEPT OF THIS NEW STRUCTURE REALLY SECONDARY AND NOT PRIMARY, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, IT'S OVER 100FT, BUT WE DON'T, YOU KNOW, THE PURPOSE OF THAT BUILDING, LIKE WE MENTIONED BEFORE, IS NOT TO DRAW ATTENTION TO ITSELF. IT'S, IT'S SORT OF IT'S, YOU KNOW, THAT BUILDING IS, LIKE I MENTIONED BEFORE, IS KIND OF CREATING THE ABILITY TO HAVE THIS SITE BE DEVELOPED AND LEAVE ALL THE EXISTING STRUCTURES AS IS. SO THE NATURE OF ITS FUNCTION REALLY IS WHY IT'S ARCHITECTURALLY EXPRESSED THE WAY IT IS. AND OUR EFFORTS WERE TO, TO MAKE SOMETHING BOTH SIMPLE AND BEAUTIFUL, BUT ALSO HAVE THE PARKING UNDERNEATH AND A BANQUET SPACE ON THE SECOND FLOOR IN A IN A HOTEL ROOMS, ETC. SO WE BELIEVE, YOU KNOW, THIS GREEN COLOR WAS WAS FROM THE PALETTE OF THE THE CORRIDOR OF VIEW FOR THIS PARTICULAR PART OF KING STREET. WE THINK IT WOULD WORK GREAT WITH THE LANDSCAPE, THE EXISTING BUILDING COLORS AS WELL AS THE, THE TRIM COLOR OPTION, AS WELL AS JUST NATURAL MATERIALS. IF YOU KNOW, INEVITABLY THE PAVERS, THE SITE WALLS THAT ARE, YOU KNOW, MORE, MORE MUTED NATURAL COLORS. TO ADDRESS SPECIFICALLY. 130 KING STREET, WHAT WE'RE, I GUESS IN OUR OPINION, WE'RE KEEPING COMPLETELY WITH WHAT THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE OF THIS BUILDING IS RIGHT NOW. THE ROOF OF THIS BUILDING IS A WOOD FRAME ROOF, WHICH WILL HAVE TO CHANGE THAT IN ORDER TO INHABIT THE ROOF IN ORDER TO, TO SORT OF ALLOW PEOPLE ON TOP OF IT.
BUT THE BUILDING IS CURRENTLY A CONCRETE, JUST PAINTED CONCRETE BLOCK, WHICH, YOU KNOW, IF SOMEONE CAME TO ME AND ASKED ME TO, TO, TO CREATE A PUBLIC BUILDING WITH THE EXTERIOR IS PAINTED CONCRETE BLOCK. AS AN ARCHITECT, I WOULD SAY IT'S PROBABLY NOT A GOOD IDEA FOR WATERPROOFING REALLY TO DO THAT. AND LONGEVITY ALSO JUST THE CHARACTER OF CONCRETE BLOCK THAT'S EXPOSED IS MORE SUBJECT TO WHEN AND WHERE WAS THIS BUILT AS OPPOSED TO JUST A STUCCO FINISH. SO REALLY THE STUCCO FINISH, IF IT WAS A STICK, IT'S NOT A STICKING POINT FOR US AS A DESIGN FEATURE. IT'S MORE OF A UTILITY FEATURE FOR LONGEVITY OF THE BUILDING, WATERPROOFING, ETC. IT ALSO WOULD ELIMINATE, YOU KNOW, TRIPLICATES OF MATERIALS ON THE SITE. OUR NEW STRUCTURE WOULD BE STUCCO. THIS BUILDING, WE'RE JUST PROPOSING TO STUCCO WHAT IS NOW AN EXISTING CONCRETE BLOCK, WHICH TO ME FROM A DISTANCE IS IS BARELY VISIBLE FROM HOW IT IS NOW FROM A PASSERBY. IT'S, YOU KNOW, NOT REALLY UNTIL YOU GET UP REALLY CLOSE THAT YOU WOULD SAY, OH, THIS IS JUST PAINTED CONCRETE BLOCK VERSUS STUCCO. SO OUR PARAPET WALL, WHICH JUST CONTINUES THAT CONCRETE BLOCK AND STUCCO AND REALLY THE, THE DETAILING WHICH MRS. SEYMOUR TALKED ABOUT REALLY WAS JUST THE IDEA THAT WE'D CREATE SOME HORIZONTALS TO SORT OF CAP THE TOP OF THAT, THAT THE BUILDING, THE PARAPET. AND THEN ON TOP OF IT, WE'D HAVE A, YOU KNOW, A, YOU KNOW, TWO FEET OF, OF METAL RAILING TO MAKE, TO SORT OF ACHIEVE OUR SAFETY, OUR SAFETY LEVEL, AS OPPOSED TO CONTINUING THE CONCRETE BLOCK ALL THE WAY UP. THAT HIGH DECREASES VISIBILITY. ALSO JUST PROPORTIONATELY. IT WASN'T AS NICE. SO IN OUR VIEW, THAT METAL RAILING WILL BE PAINTED A DARKER COLOR, IT'LL VISUALLY GO AWAY ESSENTIALLY. AGAIN ON MR. MR. GEORGE'S COMMENT ABOUT HAVING A SPACE FOR THE PUBLIC TO ACCESS THE STREET. YOU KNOW, AGAIN, THESE PLANTERS WILL MOST LIKELY BE NOT BUILT IN, BUT JUST, YOU KNOW, JUST INDIVIDUAL PLANTERS. SO THE IDEA THAT COULD BE FLEXIBLE AND MOVE
[00:15:04]
AROUND. BUT, BUT WE WILL, YOU KNOW, WE, WE KEPT THE IDEA THAT YOU COULD SORT OF OCCUPY THE CENTER OF THAT SPACE WITHOUT BEING COMPLETELY IMPEDED ON ALL THREE SIDES BY THE PLANTERS.AND LASTLY, THE 136 KING STREET, I THINK, MISS SEYMOUR, I THINK YOU SAID 236 BUT IT WAS 136 JUST A THERE'S A LOT OF NUMBERS AND A LOT OF PROPERTIES. SO THIS BUILDING WE DID IT'S. AND AGAIN, THERE'S A LOT OF BUILDINGS, THERE'S A LOT OF PROPERTIES. WE DID SUBMIT THE THE ELEVATION OF THIS BUILDING IN OUR ORIGINAL PACKAGE. I THINK IT MIGHT HAVE JUST BEEN UNCLEAR INITIALLY WHAT, WHAT, WHERE THIS BUILDING WAS, BUT SO IT'S JUST TO ORIENT EVERYONE.
IT'S THIS BUILDING HERE THAT IS CIRCLED. IT'S BEHIND 136 KING STREET. AND IT'S THIS NEW STRUCTURE IS OCCUPYING ACTUALLY AN EXISTING FOOTPRINT OF WHAT USED TO BE THE CARRIAGE HOUSE.
SO WE'RE KEEPING THE EXACT SAME FOOTPRINT OF THIS BUILDING AND ESSENTIALLY REBUILDING IT LIKE WE BELIEVE IT USED TO BE REBUILT WITH A MASONRY GROUND FLOOR THAT IS SERVING AS SORT OF THE POOL BAR. YOU CAN KIND OF SEE HERE, THIS IS SORT OF A SECTION AND ELEVATION. WE'RE CUTTING THROUGH THE POOL AND THEN LOOKING AT THE FRONT OF THIS NEW STRUCTURE. AND THEN WE JUST HAVE ROOM TO HAVE TWO SORT OF UNIQUE HOTEL SUITES ABOVE THIS SPACE THAT WOULD LOOK DOWN OVER THE POOL. AGAIN, THIS, LIKE MANY THINGS ON THIS SITE, IT'S, IT'S DOING MORE THINGS THAN ONE. WE HAVE SITE ACCESS THAT HAS TO SORT OF PASS FROM A, FROM JUST A LOGISTICS AND PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE OF THE HOTEL USERS BEHIND THIS BUILDING ON THE SORT OF WHAT WOULD BE THE EAST SIDE. AND THERE'S ALSO A GRADE CHANGE BECAUSE WE HAVE A, A RAISED POOL DECK, AND NOW WE'RE BRINGING PEDESTRIANS AND VISITORS BACK DOWN NORTH TO OVIEDO. SO THERE'S ACTUALLY, YOU CAN SEE HERE A QUICK LITTLE 3D VIEW OF OUR POOL DECK.
HERE'S THAT BUILDING WITH, WITH SORT OF, YOU KNOW, WE'RE, WE'RE ANTICIPATING THAT BEING CLAD IN, YOU KNOW, SIMILARLY TO THE OTHER EXISTING STRUCTURES, IT'S A SMALL BUILDING. THERE'S NO REALLY NEED OR FOR IT TO, TO, TO BE DIFFERENT OR STAND OUT PROPORTIONATELY. IT CAN, IT CAN LIVE IN THE WORLD OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURES. SO WE'RE, WE'RE PROPOSING THAT TO BE THE FRAME VERNACULAR, JUST WITH HORIZONTAL SIDING, THE RAILING SPECIFICALLY, I WAS ACTUALLY THINKING WE IN THIS CASE, I WAS THINKING WE WOULD GO NOT DO A METAL RAILING. WE WOULD ACTUALLY DO A WOOD RAILING. WHAT WE'RE WHAT OUR DRAWING. AND AGAIN, THESE ARE JUST SCHEMATIC DRAWINGS. WHAT THEY INDICATE IS A HORIZONTAL WOOD RAILING. SO YOU COULD SORT OF HAVE SOME MORE NATURAL MATERIAL AT THESE AT THESE SORT OF SMALL STRUCTURES. YOU CAN SEE WE HAVE SOME TYPE OF SEPARATION WALL IN BETWEEN WHAT WOULD BE THE TWO BALCONIES OF THESE SUITES. SO LIKE THE RAILING ITSELF AND THIS, YOU KNOW, SCREEN WALL THAT WOULD, YOU KNOW, HOPEFULLY BE PLANTED WOULD WOULD ALLOW THE PRIVACY THERE. SO WE ALSO HAVE, YOU KNOW, SOME TYPE OF SIMILAR RAILINGS FOR THIS RAMP HERE. ALL OF THOSE WOULD, WOULD SORT OF LIVE IN, IN CONCERT TOGETHER. AND AGAIN, THIS IS, YOU KNOW, VERY FAR BACK FROM THE STREET, YOU KNOW, I MEAN, HONESTLY, IT WILL BE SEEN BETWEEN THE LANDSCAPE BETWEEN 136 AND 134. THEN THE POOL DECK ITSELF HAS HAS A WALL AND A RAILING ACTIVITY HAPPENING IN THE POOL DECK AREA. AND THEN THIS BUILDING, THERE'S, I JUST TRYING TO DESCRIBE THE AMOUNT OF LAYERS IN FRONT OF IN FRONT OF THIS STRUCTURE IN PARTICULAR. AND YOU CAN SEE JUST RIGHT BEHIND IT IS THIS LITTLE EXISTING COTTAGE AS WELL. SO THAT'S THAT, THAT SECOND ROOF THAT'S BEHIND IT HERE OR AGAIN, RIGHT HERE, A LOT OF THINGS HAPPENING IN THIS PART OF THE SITE. THIS, THIS WAS JUST SHOWING, ZOOMING IN TO OUR SORT OF OUR GREEN FOR THE NEW HOTEL BUILDING. THIS IS THE FULL ELEVATION OF THAT BUILDING. BUT THEN THIS IS SORT OF A CROPPED VIEW OF WHAT YOU WOULD SEE FROM KING STREET. NONE OF THAT HAS HAS CHANGED OTHER THAN US SELECTING A COLOR FROM FROM THE LAST TIME WE SAW YOU GUYS. AND AGAIN, JUST THIS IS A DIAGRAM THAT I THINK OR SKETCH THAT NICELY SORT OF SHOWS THE DISTANCE FROM THE STREET, THE NEW HOTEL BUILDING, HERE'S THAT POOL POOL BAR STRUCTURE HERE, SET BACK FROM 136 KING STREET. OKAY, SO IT'S FAIRLY MINOR CHANGES, PRETTY SURGICAL ON THE LANDSCAPE. SO THE FIRST BIT WAS THE YUCCA. MR. GEORGE, YOU ASKED IF WE COULD MOVE IT AWAY FROM THE DOORS. SO WE'VE SLIPPED THOSE OVER TO THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING AND THEN THE MAIN PATIO. WE DO HAVE CONSTRICTED SOIL SPACE, SOIL VOLUME. SO IT'S HARD TO GET, YOU KNOW, LARGE SHADE TREE OAK OR MAPLE OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
BUT OLIVES, I THINK WOULD FIT VERY WELL. SO AS AN EXAMPLE, YOU KNOW, THERE'S, THERE'S THE PHOTO ON CATHEDRAL PLACE. WE PLANTED THOSE 7 OR 8 YEARS AGO AND THEY HAVE BEEN THRIVING AND THEY DO REALLY WELL IN THIS CONSTRICTED SOIL SPACES. AND I THINK THEY'LL, THEY'LL LOOK EXCELLENT WITH THE ARCHITECTURE. SO YOU CAN SEE THE ELEVATION. THIS IS WHERE THOSE OLIVE TREES
[00:20:01]
ARE. WE ALSO SWITCHED OUT ONE ADDITIONAL TREE HERE AT THE CORNER HERE YOU CAN SEE THAT ONE THAT IS NOW A CEDAR TREE. SO CITY TREE INCREASES OUR OUR SHADE COUNT. THEN ON THE GATE.SO WHAT TO DISCUSS THIS IN A LITTLE BIT OF DETAIL BECAUSE WE HAD SOME CONVERSATIONS LAST TIME. WAS IT, YOU KNOW, DO WE TAKE IT DOWN EIGHT INCHES? DO WE NOT TAKE IT DOWN EIGHT INCHES? CURRENTLY IT'S EIGHT FEET TALL TO THE COLUMNS. AND WE MODELED THAT SCALE ON THE MARKLAND HOUSE ENTRANCE, WHICH YOU CAN SEE THE PHOTO OF HERE. AND THOSE ARE ALSO EIGHT FOOT TALL COLUMNS. SO I'D LIKE TO KEEP THAT SCALE IF WE CAN. I THINK IT'S IT FEELS GOOD. IT FEELS GOOD ON THE STREET TOO. IT DOESN'T, YOU KNOW, THAT DOESN'T STRIKE ME AS SOMETHING THAT'S TOO OVERBEARING. AND THEN FINALLY IT'S JUST A LOCATIONS UTILITY LOCATIONS. SO WE INDICATED WHERE THOSE ARE ON THE PLAN. WE'LL BE TALKING. I MEAN, THERE'S A LOT OF THERE'S A LOT OF LITTLE SPACES ON THE SITE FOR US TO, TO PLACE THESE, BUT WE'LL BE GETTING THEM BEHIND THE BUILDINGS AND OUT OF SIGHT OF KING STREET. AND THAT CONCLUDES THE PRESENTATION. SO WE ARE AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. WELL, I GUESS I THINK THE OLIVE TREES ARE A REALLY NICE CHOICE FOR THE FRONT. AND I APPRECIATE YOU GUYS GETTING A LITTLE BIT MORE OF THAT GREENERY AT THE STREET. I THINK IT'LL, YOU KNOW, BENEFIT THE USERS OF THE SPACE.
BUT ALSO I THINK THE USERS ON THE SIDEWALK AND THE PEDESTRIANS, I THINK THAT JUST CREATES A MUCH MORE HOSPITABLE ENVIRONMENT. I WILL SAY, AND, YOU KNOW, NOT TO GET INTO TOO MUCH INTO THE WEEDS THEY ARE CAN BE A SLOWER GROWING TREE. I'D PROBABLY RECOMMEND STARTING WITH SOME NICE ONES IN THE FRONT. YOU GUYS PROBABLY ARE GOING TO DO THAT ANYWAY, BUT THOSE FOUR TREES, I THINK COULD BE A REALLY NICE KIND OF STATEMENT. AND YEAH, THANKS FOR THE OTHER LANDSCAPE CHANGES. I THINK THAT'LL FEEL REALLY NICE. ONE QUESTION FOR CONNOR. MR. DOWLING ON THE TOP OF THE PARAPET WALL. ARE THOSE THE HORIZONTALS? IS THAT LIKE A JOINT, A STUCCO JOINT, JUST ALMOST LIKE A FRIEZE, LIKE A, YOU KNOW, 8 OR 10 INCH, YOU KNOW, REVEAL ESSENTIALLY THAT WOULD WE'RE ANTICIPATING PAINTING THE SAME COLOR AS THE BUILDING. JUST TO ADD SOME EMPHASIS, A LITTLE DEPTH AND DETAILING. EXACTLY. YEAH, YEAH.
AND I PERSONALLY, I THINK THE STUCCO IS A GOOD APPLICATION FOR THAT BUILDING. I DON'T, YOU KNOW, SEE ANY ISSUE, YOU'RE KIND OF, I GUESS, ELEVATING IT A LITTLE BIT. BUT REALLY, I THINK MAKING IT FEEL LIKE MORE OF A FINISHED PRODUCT AS OPPOSED TO, I THINK THAT BUILDING, DRIVING BY, IT ALWAYS JUST FELT LIKE SOMEBODY PUT A BLOCK STRUCTURE IN FRONT OF A WOODEN HOUSE AND IT DIDN'T FEEL VERY THOUGHT OUT. SO I THINK KIND OF COMPLETING THE IDEA WITH STUCCO FINISH IS NICE. AND I LIKE KIND OF CARRYING IT UP. AND AGAIN, YOU KNOW, ACCESSING THE ROAD. I THINK THAT'S A, A NICE CHANGE. SO I APPRECIATE THE COMMENTS. A LITTLE ROOFTOP KIND OF ALLOWING THAT TO, TO PUSH OUT. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING? SO ALL THE BUILDINGS, THERE'LL BE DIFFERENT COLORS ON EACH ONE. IS THAT REALLY. NO, THEY'LL ALL BE THE SAME. THEY'LL ALL BE THE WHITE COLOR, WHICH ACTUALLY THEY'RE PAINTED RIGHT NOW, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF 136 IS NOT PAINTED THAT COLOR TODAY CURRENTLY. BUT THAT'S, THAT'S WHAT RYAN AND DONNA WOULD LIKE TO DO. TRIMS WILL BE DIFFERENT. THE TRIMS WOULD WOULD MATCH PROBABLY LIKE OF, OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS. AND THEN THE NEW BUILDING WOULD JUST REALLY IT'S ALMOST JUST LIKE THE NEW STUCCO BUILDING WOULD BE THE GREEN COLOR. THE. IF WE ADD NEW STUCCO ON THE. 130, IT WOULD BE WHITE. YEAH, I THINK THAT'LL LOOK GREAT. I THINK IT'LL LOOK REALLY GOOD. WHAT ABOUT STRING LIGHTS? I MEAN, I DON'T HAVE A VERSION TO STRING LIGHTS, BUT ARE THEY SELL THEM AT HOME DEPOT, SO IT MUST BE OKAY. I THOUGHT FOR THAT OR REAL QUICK WAS ALSO IT'S I MEAN, I THINK IT WOULD LOOK PRETTY PARTICULARLY LIKE WOULDN'T BE ON ALL THE TIME. I DON'T THINK I THINK JUST AS NEEDED AND IT, YOU KNOW, IT'S, IT'S NOT RIGHT ON THE STREET. IT'S SET BACK FROM THE STREET SOMEWHAT AND UP IN THE AIR. BUT YEAH, I MEAN, EVERYBODY HAS THEM. I THINK THAT'S KIND OF A GOOD A STATEMENT ABOUT SOME KIND OF FESTIVITY OR SOMETHING. YOU KNOW, IT'S A POSITIVE THING, I THINK. SO I DON'T HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH THAT. THE I THINK THE UTILITIES, DID WE GET TO THAT POINT. THAT WAS ONE OF OUR ONE OF OUR THINGS THAT YOU RESUBMITTED. YES. CORRECT. ON THE SCREEN RIGHT NOW IS THE THE LOCATIONS WE WE PROVIDED FOR THESE UPDATED UTILITIES. SO THERE'S A GREASE TRAP ASSOCIATED WITH THE RESTAURANT THAT'LL BE DIRECTLY BEHIND THIS IS 130 KING STREET. SO THERE'S ABSOLUTELY NO VISIBILITY. AND THEN WE HAVE AN APPROXIMATE AREA FOR RELOCATION OF SOME AC. ALSO A LOT OF THESE, A LOT OF THESE EXISTING BUILDINGS WILL BE ABLE TO USE PACKAGE UNITS. THEY'RE MUCH SMALLER. THEY
[00:25:05]
WON'T BE BIG NEW UNITS EXCEPT THE NEW BUILDING WILL HAVE THAT BUT WOULD BE SET BACK. AND ON THE ROOF ARE THE GREASE TRAPS UNDERGROUND UNDER THE. YES, SIR. YEAH. THE, THE ONE THAT WERE THAT WERE REQUIRED IS WILL BE, WILL BE BELOW GRADE. OKAY. YEAH. YEAH. AND I WOULD JUST AGREE WITH THE, THE LIGHTING. I THINK IT'S REALLY NICE TO HAVE SOME SUBTLE OVERHEAD LIGHTING. AND I THINK A LOT OF OTHER MECHANISMS THAT WE USE TO ACHIEVE THAT WOULD BE MORE DISRUPTIVE VISUALLY THAN KIND OF THE SIMPLICITY OF A STRING LIGHT. SO I THINK THAT'S A NICE SOLUTION. YOU KNOW, A LOT OF TIMES THERE'S A LOT OF FESTIVITY AND A LOT OF LIGHTS IN THE AREA, AND I THINK IT CAN BLEND IN. YEAH. AND I GUESS JUST A QUICK COMMENT, I THINK THE ONE 36.5 FEELS LIKE A NICE, I LIKE IT SORT OF BEING LIKE, IT'S KIND OF LIKE THE BOOKEND OF A COTTAGE FOR THE POOL. I THINK THAT'S FEELING NICE. AND I DON'T REALLY HAVE A PARTICULAR LIKE ISSUE WITH THE HORIZONTAL. IT LOOKS LIKE, YOU KNOW, MY APPROACH WOULD JUST BE TO SEE IF THERE'S A CUE FROM THE EXISTING ARCHITECTURE. MAYBE IT'S KIND OF SEEMS LIKE 134 THERE'S SOME HORIZONTALS UP THERE ON THE SECOND STORY PORCH THAT COULD BE SORT OF A MODEL.IF THERE IS SOMETHING THAT YOU COULD PULL OFF THAT ARCHITECTURE AND RELATE TO THAT RAIL, I THINK THAT COULD BE NICE, BUT I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH KIND OF THE ORIENTATION OF IT. I'M PRETTY COMFORTABLE WITH THE CHANGES AND THE THINGS THAT YOU'VE ADDRESSED IN RELATIONSHIP TO EACH INDIVIDUAL BUILDING. I THINK THAT WAS THE WAY THAT WE WERE SUPPOSED TO ADDRESS THAT. I BELIEVE THE THE GATE, I THINK, WAS THE THING THAT WE DID NOT FINISH ON. I THINK. USING THE MARKLAND HOUSE AS A AS A MODEL FOR THAT. I'M COMFORTABLE WITH THAT. HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THAT? FITS. IT FITS. I THINK IT'S A STATEMENT I THINK YOU NEED. HERE'S THE FRONT DOOR. HERE WE ARE. IT'S A STATEMENT. SO I DON'T OBJECT TO THAT AT ALL. I THINK IT'S IT'S WELL DONE. YEAH. I THINK HONESTLY THAT PHOTOGRAPH IS REALLY HELPFUL. I THINK THE REFERENCE OF FLAGLER. AND THEN I WAS THINKING THAT BIG BUILDING AND THE SCALE AND PROPORTION. BUT I THINK THAT PHOTO IS A NICE CONTEXT AND EXAMPLE OF HOW IT CAN WORK. IT'S ALSO SET BACK. IT DOES KIND OF PULL BACK. SO I THINK IT LOOKS GOOD, I LIKE IT.
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NOTHING. WELL, WE DO NEED TO OPEN UP TO PUBLIC COMMENT.
CORRECT. TECHNICALLY. BUT IS THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM YOU GUYS. NO. OKAY. ARE THERE ANY OKAY. WELL IT IS A PUBLIC MEETING, SO I DON'T SEE ANYBODY THAT'S PUBLIC OUT THERE. SO WE'RE GOOD. BUT. ALL RIGHT. I GUESS WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENT AT THIS POINT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ARE THERE ANY LETTERS SUPPORTING OR. WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY COMMUNICATIONS? NO. ALL RIGHT. LET ME SWITCH OVER HERE. ANY EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS? NO. NOTHING. NO, SIR. ALL RIGHT. WELL, I GUESS IT'S A IT'S OUR TURN TO SPEAK SO TO EACH OTHER. SO WE'LL TAKE A SECOND AND DO THAT. FIVE, 758. I HAVE NOTHING. YEAH. I THINK THE I THINK THE APPLICANT RESPONDED WELL TO THE COMMENTS THAT WE HAD. AND I APPRECIATE KIND OF THE WORKING WITH YOU ALL TO, I THINK, MAKE IT AS GOOD AS IT CAN BE. I THINK AT THE END OF THE DAY, WE ALL WANT REALLY GREAT, VIBRANT THINGS HAPPENING IN OUR TOWN AND IN THESE CORRIDORS, AND I'M HAPPY TO SEE THIS ONE KIND OF MOVING FORWARD WHERE IT IS. DEFINITELY. YEAH, I FEEL LIKE IT'S ABOUT TIME I'VE BEEN LOOKING AT THOSE BUILDINGS FOREVER AND EVER. IT'LL BE GREAT TO SEE SOMETHING, SOMETHING THAT WE ALL WANT TO GO AND VISIT OURSELVES. YES, EXACTLY. EXACTLY LIKE THAT ROOFTOP BAR. SOUNDS GOOD. ALL RIGHT. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? YOU WANT TO MAKE A MOTION? YOU WOULD MAKE A MOTION? SURE. JUST SORRY TO INTERRUPT, BUT FOR THE MOTION SPECIFICALLY, YOU'LL WANT TO ADDRESS THE THAT YOU'RE APPROVING THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLES AS PROPOSED OR AS STATED DURING THEIR PRESENTATION. AND YOU'LL ALSO WANT TO APPROVE A MODIFICATION TO THE STANDARDS FOR THE USE OF THE STRING LIGHTS ON THE ROOFTOP DECK. IF THAT IS SOMETHING THAT YOU ARE APPROVING TODAY. OKAY, SO STRING LIGHTS. AND THE ARCHITECTURAL. HOW DO YOU WANT ME TO WORD IT? STYLES, STYLE AND EACH ITEM WILL HAVE TO BE TAKEN SEPARATELY. DO YOU WANT
[00:30:04]
TO DO ONE FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL? WE CAN'T GO 55, 56, 57, 58 TYPICALLY. GENERALLY WE WOULD NEED A MOTION FOR EACH ITEM INDIVIDUALLY BECAUSE THEY'RE SEPARATE APPLICATIONS FOR SEPARATE PROPERTIES. OH GOOD. GLAD TO HEAR IT. OKAY. AND JUST ONE MORE THING. SO, YOU KNOW, AS MISS SEYMOUR INDICATED, THE APPLICATION STILL NEEDS TO BE FINALLY HAVE FINAL APPROVAL FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD. SO IF ANYTHING THAT GOES BEFORE THEM AT THE NEXT MEETING REQUIRES A CHANGE TO THE DESIGN, IT MAY HAVE TO COME BACK. SO JUST BE AWARE OF THAT SO YOU CAN CONTINUE IT BASED ON KNOWING THAT THAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN OR APPROVE IT, AND KNOW THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE TO HEAR IT AGAIN. OKAY, I DON'T, I DON'T, I WOULD APPROVE IT. AND IF WE HAVE TO HEAR IT AGAIN, LET'S HEAR IT AGAIN. YEAH. YEAH. I THINK THAT MAKES SENSE. YEAH.THAT'S FINE. OKAY, SO I MOVE, I MOVE TO APPROVE DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION HB 2026-0055.
FINDING THAT THE PROJECT OVERALL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE DESIGN STANDARDS, THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLES AND MEETS THE REVIEW CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL WITH THE CONDITIONS THAT INCLUDING THE STRING LIGHTS AND. ARCHITECTURAL STYLE, SHOULD I SAID ARCHITECTURAL STYLES, I THINK. AND UPDATED LANDSCAPE DESIGN, THE UPDATED LANDSCAPE AND I'M MAKING A MESS OF THIS ONE. AND THEN I WANT TO SCRATCH THAT OUT. MOTION ITEM. UNIQUE FEATURES AND APPLICATIONS. WHY DON'T YOU GO FOR IT, ELIJAH? I'M LOSING. I'LL GIVE IT A SHOT HERE. SO I MOVED TO APPROVE DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION HP20260055. FINDING THE PROJECT OVERALL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE DESIGN STANDARDS AND MEETS THE REVIEW CRITERIA FOR THE APPROVAL. WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLES AND STRING LIGHTS. WE RECOMMEND THE CRC APPLIED CONDITIONS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE MOTION. IDENTIFY UNIQUE. OH YEAH, AND TO APPROVE WHATEVER THIS IS SUBSTANTIAL. APPROVE AND AVOID A PERCEIVED ASSUMPTION AS. YES, WE REALLY DO KNOW WHAT WE'RE DOING. YEAH, WE JUST DON'T SPEAK THE LINGO. THAT'S RIGHT.
SO WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO SECOND THAT. I'LL SECOND IT. ALL IN FAVOR. AYE, AYE. SO WE JUST NEED TO DO THAT FOUR MORE TIMES. YES. YOU WON'T NEED TO INCLUDE THE STRING LIGHTS ON THE OTHER THREE BECAUSE THEY'RE ONLY FOR 130 KING STREET. OKAY. SO BY THE END OF THIS TOWN I MOVE TO APPROVE THE DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION. HP20260056. FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS OVERALL CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE DESIGN STANDARDS AND MEETS REVIEW CRITERIA FOR THE APPROVAL. RECOMMEND THAT STAFF MAY RECOMMEND OR CRC APPLY CONDITIONS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE MOTION. AND THAT LOOKS LIKE I'M READING SOMETHING THAT'S IN PARENTHESES. DO I JUST STOP AT THAT END AND NOT READ THE PARENTHESES? YES. OKAY. GOT IT. I'LL GET THAT RIGHT ON THE NEXT ONE. SO I THINK THAT FINISHES THE SECOND ONE. YEAH. SOMEBODY WANT TO SECOND YOU FOR A SECOND THAT I KNOW I'LL SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR I. I MOVE TO APPROVE DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION HP20260057. FINDING THAT THE PROJECT OVERALL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE DESIGN STANDARDS AND MEETS THE REVIEW CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL. WITH THE CONDITIONS THAT ARCHITECTURAL STYLES. THAT'S IT, THAT'S IT. OKAY, SECOND. I'LL SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR. AYE, AYE. I MOVE TO APPROVE DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION. HP202600550058.
FINDING THAT THE OVERALL THE PROJECT OVERALL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE DESIGN STANDARDS AND MEETS THE REVIEW. THE REVIEW CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL WITH THE CONDITIONS THAT WE STATED. OKAY, I'LL SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR. AYE AYE. I THINK THAT'S IT. I BELIEVE SO, MISS COURTNEY, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING YOU NEED TO MAKE SURE THERE'S NO OTHER BUSINESS AND
[00:35:03]
THEN NEED TO DISCUSS THE NEXT SCHEDULED MEETING, AND THEN WE'LL GO TO ADJOURNMENT. OKAY.SO. WELL, THE NEXT SCHEDULED MEETING WAS NOVEMBER 5TH. NOVEMBER 5TH. ALL RIGHT.
THERE'S NO FURTHER ITEMS ON THE AGENDA. SO THANK YOU APPLICANTS. WE APPRECIATE YOU GUYS COMING IN. SORRY FOR DIFFUSION. IT'S A LOT OF IF THERE IS NO FURTHER BUSINESS, I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. I'LL SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR. AYE, AYE.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.